Tous
← Back to Squawk list
First look at the Airbus A350 XWB. What's all the fuss about?
Images, the specs and the troubled history of Airbus' super lightweight plane. Can it take on Boeing and importantly, what does it mean for travelers? (travel.cnn.com) Plus d'info...Sort type: [Top] [Newest]
If its Boeing....I ain't going!!!!
I didn't bother reading the article - I just wanted to say hi! I don't like the french very much, and "if it ain't boeing I ain't going".
Ok, ive said everything I wanted to
Nice seeing you all
J
Ok, ive said everything I wanted to
Nice seeing you all
J
The reason that the noses look so much alike is the same reason that new autos tend to look alike, namely, physics. As both the 787 and the A350 are maximized to cruise at .85 mach and the fact that both fuselage cross sections are nearly circular, it is just engineering, not copying. You might as well say they copied the look of the vertical stabilizers or the engine nacelles.
The big difference is in the mix of materials. The 787 (contrary to the article) has a larger percentage of composite materials that are spun in place into complete sections called "barrels." This means there is a huge decrease in the amount of individual parts and the associated fasteners. The A350, by contrast, has sections that are built-up in a more traditional style utilizing composites, titanium and LiAl alloys. Look closely at photos of the two aircraft and you will notice the absolute lack of fasteners on the 787 skin. Compare that to the photo of the A350 nose section. I have stood next to a 787 and it looks like a giant model airplane, smooth and sleek. Time will tell which one is "better" I think the market has plenty of room for both.
The big difference is in the mix of materials. The 787 (contrary to the article) has a larger percentage of composite materials that are spun in place into complete sections called "barrels." This means there is a huge decrease in the amount of individual parts and the associated fasteners. The A350, by contrast, has sections that are built-up in a more traditional style utilizing composites, titanium and LiAl alloys. Look closely at photos of the two aircraft and you will notice the absolute lack of fasteners on the 787 skin. Compare that to the photo of the A350 nose section. I have stood next to a 787 and it looks like a giant model airplane, smooth and sleek. Time will tell which one is "better" I think the market has plenty of room for both.
A350 struggles to compete with both 777 and 787
It may work for Airbus or may not, we will see, it's just too early to say.
It may work for Airbus or may not, we will see, it's just too early to say.
IS it me or does the nose of the A350 look a lot like the nose of the B787? It looks like they waited for Boeing to finalize their design then used it to as a template for theirs.
You are right. Stole the 787 nose. Can't come up with there own ideas. More French Airbus junk. I wonder if they fly it with a SUGGESTION STICK as well?
If it ain't Boeing, I'm not going!