Back to Squawk list
  • 26

Watch the First Privately Owned F-16 Fighter Jet Soar Across the Skies of Arizona

Soumis
 
Who says you can’t own a fighter jet? The first privately owned F-16 just tore up the skies of Arizona as part of a new defense initiative. The lightning-fast aircraft in question is the property of Top Aces. The private adversary support firm took delivery of four F-16A/B “Netz” fighters back in January as part of a training contract with the US Air Force. On Wednesday, the first second-hand F-16 earned FAA certification and completed its maiden flight for Top Aces. (robbreport.com) Plus d'info...

Sort type: [Top] [Newest]


ssobol
Stefan Sobol 9
Not sure I would call this "privately" owned, more like "corporate" owned. IMM, privately owned means owned by an individual. Like Joe Pilot and his Cessna 172.
k9wrangler
Karl Scribner -5
Corporate makes it evil right?

In my little slice of the world, corporations are owned by shareholders, rather than government entities, therefore “private” but word games seem silly.
ssobol
Stefan Sobol 5
Never said it was evil, just not "privately" owned in most people's usage of the word.

@Karl - You're reading something into my comment that wasn't there.
ceoch255
ceoch255 2
Great,corporate owned fighter jets. What could possibly go wrong?
bentwing60
bentwing60 2
The "Top Aces" will have a tough time recruiting a true "Ace" to perform their adversarial 'magic' in the cockpit, as, according to Wiki., there hasn't been a true U.S. military fighter Ace since the Vietnam era. Nor will they be confronting any. Maybe one owns the joint and thusly 'follow the money'! Cheers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_aces_of_aces
jbermo
jbermo 4
I suppose being a "Red Flag" (AF) or "Top Gun" (USN) participent with 5 or more confirmed electronic kills doesn't count.
k9wrangler
Karl Scribner 2
ACE hardware has killer deals, maybe they have some friendly hardware, fliers.
Ricovandijk
Rico van Dijk 2
Perhaps they can become an ace on the job, if they go rogue against the other traffic in the pattern ;)
sparkie624
sparkie624 1
Very true... You have to have at least 1 armed conflict with 5 kills to be an ace.. LOL. Good point.
djames225
djames225 1
What the report failed to inform people of is Top Aces "home turf" I believe there are a few other countries that have "ace" pilots.
bentwing60
bentwing60 1
Correct. I noted U.S. military, the subject of the contract. The company is Canada based, and, if one follows the link, the later era aces of varied nationalities would probably be timed out age wise or, to say the least, an Iranian ace will not be flying in an adversarial role in an F16 for "Top Gun". Where are the Aces?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Top_Aces
RothbardM
Mort Rothbard 0
Seems many pilots like to vent sbout absolutely nonsense subject. From Ace to private. Oh well. Go to it guys
hselden
Howard Selden 1
Is $6.4 billion a lot of money, or is it pocket change?
alancurtis2
alan curtis 1
So would this be considered an assault weapon by the ATF?
dragonstrike3564
Terry LeGrand 1
Like Stefan said
evvvvv
I Dunno 1
That's not privately owned, it's government contract operation(s)!

Se connecter

Vous n'avez pas de compte? Inscrivez-vous maintenant (gratuitement) pour des fonctionnalités personnalisées, des alertes de vols, et plus encore!
Ce site web utilise des cookies. En utilisant et en naviguant davantage sur ce site, vous acceptez cela.
Rejeter
Saviez-vous que le suivi des vols FlightAware est soutenu par la publicité ?
Vous pouvez nous aider à garder FlightAware gratuit en autorisant les annonces de FlightAware.com. Nous travaillons dur pour que notre publicité reste pertinente et discrète afin de créer une expérience formidable. Il est facile et rapide de mettre les annonces en liste blanche sur FlightAware ou d’examiner nos comptes premium.
Rejeter